If you review or post news about photographic gear, and you rely on crosslinks whether to your site or youtube. We can help you here.
We have a special feature that allows a Contributor to post links to thier site about lenses or cameras that appear on this site.
For example, when view the photo page on this site, you will see deatils about the image such as the camera and lens used.
If you are a Contributor and you have an article, news, blog posting or video about the specific camera or lens, you can link back to your site directly from the photo page.
For example, after you create your CrossLink as a Contributor, the photo page will show the public something like this.

If interested in promoting your site like this, send us an email.
As a sponsor, take advantage of CrossLinks.
When someone is viewing a photo taken with a specific camera or lens, a Learn More about this product link will apear with a link to your review, blog, shop etc...
Here is a Crosslink Examplepurerangefinder.com has always and will always be free to use. Donations are greatly appreciated and help keep us online!
Thanks for your support
FYI, I have a Voigtlander 35mm 1.2 Version IV coming my way. The main reason for the lens coming my way is that I have the full size sample images from Leica of the new 35 Noctilux and from what I have seen, they are not clinically sharp or contrasty for a $9650.00 lens. I want to shoot similar shots with the voigtlander to make a judgement call.
NOTE, I am NOT prejudging because I do not have the Noct in hand yet. This is soley based on sample images I have already seen.
On a side note, I have large versions of the sample images and after viewing them again, I cannot see much difference between that and the latest version of the Voigtlander 35mm 1.2. Thats not to say the Voigtlander is better or worse. I need to get my hands on one or see some other posts with samples to cast judgement. As of now the jury is still out but the price is a death sentence! đź’€
How will it compare to the Voightlander 35mm f1.2? Looks to be a bit fatter but not as long.