The Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM. The Undisputed King of the M11 Sensor
In the world of M mount optics, there is a pervasive myth that the most expensive glass from Wetzlar represents the undisputed ceiling of performance. For years, the Leica 35mm Summilux f/1.4 FLE has been the benchmark. However, there is an older contender that has quietly refused to cede its throne. The Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon may not be the newest kid on the block, but even when paired with the unforgiving 60MP sensor of the Leica M11, it proves that modern and superior are not always synonyms. In fact, it might just be the best 35mm lens ever made for the M-system, period.
A Results First Evaluation
I will not spend time on MTF charts, technical bench tests, or the same academic optical data that has been reported over the last decade. This review is focused purely on real world results. Furthermore, while much has been said about the physical size of this lens, the build quality is quite simply unmatched. It is a precision instrument that feels as substantial as the images it produces, a defiance of the trend toward lighter, plastic-heavy construction.
When the Leica M11 was released, it sent many photographers hunting for the latest APO lenses to satisfy its demanding high resolution sensor. Yet, looking backward often reveals more than looking forward. The Zeiss 35mm Distagon ZM has been around for over a decade, but it feels as though it was designed specifically for the digital fidelity of 2026. While Leica’s own 35mm Summilux FLE is a masterpiece of compact engineering, the Zeiss offers a rendering and clinical perfection that remains unrivaled.
Why the Distagon Still Sets the Gold Standard:
Legendary Pop and Micro-Contrast. The Distagon design is famous for its aggressive micro contrast. It doesn't just record shapes; it renders textures and depth with a tactile quality that makes the image feel three dimensional.
Incredibly Flat Field. Unlike the Summilux FLE, the Zeiss is known for having a field curvature that is remarkably flat across the frame. This ensures that when you focus on a subject, the sharpness remains consistent from edge to edge without the dip in resolution often found in compact Leica designs.
Superior Edge Correction. The Zeiss handles high-contrast edges with more grace than the non APO Summilux. Where the Leica might show slight blooming or fringing in harsh light, the Distagon remains clean.
Perhaps most importantly, you are receiving superior optical performance and a medium format render for roughly half the price of the Leica equivalent.
This isn’t just a legacy review, it’s a re-evaluation of a modern Zeiss classic that, even in 2026, still sets the gold standard for what a 35mm lens can achieve.
A Note on Terminology: What I Mean by Micro-contrast
Throughout this review, I use the term micro-contrast frequently. In the Leica community, this is often a polarizing term, but for the purposes of this evaluation on the M11, it refers to a very specific optical phenomenon.
While sharpness generally refers to the resolution of fine lines, micro-contrast is the lens’s ability to communicate subtle tonal variations between those lines.
Texture over Outline: It is the difference between seeing the shape of a strand of hair and seeing the texture of the cuticle on that strand.
The 3D Pop: High micro-contrast creates a sense of depth by rendering a rich spectrum of mid tones, allowing subjects to appear three dimensional and tangible rather than flat.Inter tonal Definition: It allows the Zeiss 35mm ZM to distinguish between very similar shades of green in a forest or the weathered nuances of a painted buoy, even when the overall lighting is harsh or flat.
In short, while the M11’s 60MP sensor provides the resolution, it is the Zeiss Distagon’s micro-contrast that provides the clarity and bite that makes the image feel real.
Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Landscape Performance: Edge to Edge Sharpness on the Leica M11
Critics often point to the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM’s physical size as a drawback, but one look at a landscape file from the Leica M11 renders that argument moot. In this shot at f/5.6, the 'empty' blue sky actually highlights the lens's greatest strength: clinical purity. Without clouds to hide behind, the Distagon shows off its perfectly flat field of focus and aggressive micro contrast. Notice the separation in the mid ground foliage. The lens renders the scene with a '3D pop' that the Leica Summilux FLE struggles to match, providing a sense of depth and atmospheric clarity that makes the 60MP sensor truly earn its keep.
Lets analyze this image
1. Exceptional mid tone contrast. The Zeiss Pop. Despite the harsh, direct overhead lighting, look at the transition between the dark evergreens. The Zeiss doesn't just record these as colors; it records them as textures. On the M11, this lens extracts a level of grit and detail from the foliage that makes the landscape feel tactile. This is where it pulls ahead of the Summilux FLE, which tends to have a smoother, more romantic rendering that can lose this bite in complex landscapes.
2. Handling the Empty sky as sen by the lack of clouds, but look at the horizon line. A lesser lens would show a slight smearing or chromatic aberration where the dark trees meet the bright blue sky. Here, the line is super clean. There is zero purple fringing or blooming, which is a testament to the Distagon’s superior color correction. The deep, rich blue of the sky is also a signature of Zeiss T* coating, which helps cut through haze and saturates blues more naturally than Leica's coatings.
3. Edge to Edge Sharpness at f/5.6 Even in the extreme bottom corners (the immediate foreground rocks and grass), the focus remains tack sharp. Many 35mm lenses suffer from field curvature, where if the center is sharp, the corners fall off. In this shot, the plane of focus feels perfectly flat. This allows the viewer's eye to wander from the immediate foreground to the distant mountains without ever hitting a soft patch.
4. Resolving the Distant Ridge If you zoom into the far background mountains, the M11/Zeiss combo is still resolving individual tree lines and rock faces. At f/5.6, you’ve reached the diffraction limited sweet spot of the lens. It proves that this 10 year old optical design isn't just keeping up with the M11, the lens was clerly designed with future higher mp sensors in mind.
Note, although the image has been cropped from top and bottom for better composition. The image retains 100% of the frame from left to right all the way to the edges.
If the landscape shots prove the Distagon’s consistency, its portrait performance on the M11 is nothing short of clinically sharp. Looking at the facial details, every pore and fine line is rendered with a staggering level of honesty. But the real triumph is in the hair, where other lenses might smudge fine textures into a singular shape, the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM resolves individual strands with microscopic precision. This is where it leaves the Leica 35mm Summilux FLE behind. While the Leica offers a beautiful 'glow,' the Zeiss offers the 'truth' of the 60 megapixel sensor.
One of the most striking aspects of the Zeiss 35mm Distagon on the M11 is its color science. While Leica glass is often celebrated for its 'warmth,' the Zeiss provides a clinical, lifelike neutrality that is arguably a better starting point for the M11’s DNG files. But the real magic is the separation. Even at f5.6, an aperture where most lenses start to flatten the image, the Distagon maintains its legendary '3D Pop.' By prioritizing micro-contrast over simple bokeh, it carves the subject out of the frame with precision. The result is an image that feels tangible. You don't just see the texture of the hair and the skin, you feel the physical distance between the subject and the world behind them.
For the black and white enthusiast, the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM is a revelation. While many photographers hunt for vintage glass to get 'soul in their monochrome files, the Distagon offers something arguably more valuable, tonal transparency. Thanks to its exceptional contrast, the lens renders a rich spectrum of grays that most modern optics compress. Even when lighting is flat, the lens's ability to resolve fine textures gives the image a visceral, three dimensional presence. On the M11, this results in B&W files that are sharp yet possess a classic, silver halide depth that the busier bokeh of the Summilux FLE simply cannot replicate.
While the above image shows that classic look, this image demonstrates that the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM can deliver a strikingly modern monochrome. By utilizing DxO PhotoLab to harness the M11's raw dynamic range, the Zeiss glass provides the contrast necessary to make a scene feel electric. It trades the 'glow' of the Summilux FLE for a transparent, high fidelity realism where every pine needle and snowflake is accounted for. It is proof that in 2026, this 'older' lens is still the most capable tool for those who want their black and white photography to feel immediate and alive.
Additional B&W images are shown further down in this review.
Transparent Artistry: Why 'Perfection' Makes for Better Bokeh
While the Summilux FLE is often praised for its character, it can sometimes produce nervous or soap bubble bokeh (where the edges of out of focus highlights are bright and distracting). This photo shows the Zeiss doing the exact opposite.
The Leica Summilux 35mm FLE is often described as having 'soul,' which is usually code for 'optical flaws that look nice.' The Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 Distagon ZM, however, chooses the path of perfection. Shot wide open at f/1.4 on the M11, the bokeh is reminiscent of a medium format render. Creamy, effortless, and entirely devoid of the 'soap-bubble' nervousness found in Leica’s equivalent. But don't mistake smoothness for softness. The subject separation is achieved through a radical level of wide-open sharpness and a neutral color palette that feels modern and transparent. It doesn't just blur the background, it creates a three dimensional stage for the subject to live in.
Honest Chromatics: Depth Separation Beyond the Hue
While all images in this review were refined using DxO PhotoLab to ensure peak optical correction, the soul of the color comes directly from the glass. The Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM utilizes its T coating* to deliver a level of color purity that is, in many ways, more 'honest' than the Leica Summilux FLE. It avoids the warm bias of Wetzlar glass, instead offering a neutral, high contrast canvas. On the M11, this results in incredible subject separation. Again, I ahte to use this word so often. But, the micro-contrast is so high that even at f/2, the files possess a 'tactile' quality where colors feel separated by depth, not just hue.
Looking at these buoy shots, the argument for the Zeiss over the Summilux FLE becomes undeniable. The sharpness isn't just about resolution. The clarity of the rendering are key as well. Processed through DxO PhotoLab, the files reveal a lens that is essentially 'perfect.' The way it handles the texture of weathered rope and flaking paint while maintaining a deep, saturated color palette shows that this 'old' lens was actually built for the future of 60MP sensors.
In this series of monochrome captures, the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon demonstrates that it doesn’t need the latest sensor or a dedicated monochrome body to deliver impressive results. Shot on the Leica M10, these images provide a compelling argument for the flexibility of color to monochrome conversion and the inherent superiority of Zeiss’s rendering over the Leica Summilux
The Myth of the Monochrome Camera While dedicated monochrome sensors are often praised, using the M10 with the Zeiss Distagon offers a distinct advantage.
Dynamic Channel Manipulation: By starting with a color file from the M10, you have the ability to manipulate color channels during the B&W conversion in DxO PhotoLab. This allows you to lighten or darken specific tones like the skin in the bar scene or the separation in the office portrait with a level of precision a monochrome sensor simply cannot offer.
The Zeiss T* coating ensures that the raw data reaching the M11 or M10 sensor is clean and high in contrast. This provides a purer digital negative, giving you more latitude to push shadows and pull highlights without introducing muddy artifacts.
Even on the M10, the nature of the Distagon is on full display.
In the office portrait and the bar scene, look at the rendering of fabric and hair. The lens avoids the smearing often seen in the Summilux FLE, instead resolving individual fibers and strands with microscopic clarity.
Where the Summilux often relies on a glow that can soften fine details in B&W, the Zeiss provides tonal transparency. The images appear better because they possess an integrity that makes the subjects feel more tangible and three-dimensional.
The Zeiss Pop is particularly evident in these greyscale files. The lens manages to find separation between very similar shades of grey, creating a silver halide depth that feels sophisticated and expensive.
As mentioned before, complaining about the size of the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon is a moot point. While it is undeniably larger than the Leica Summilux FLE, the proof is in the files. The lens just works. It doesn't ask for compromises in the corners or wide open performance; it simply delivers a perfect frame every time you hit the shutter.
On a body like the M10 or M11, the extra bulk whih in this case is minimal is a small price to pay for the medium format rendering and clinical clarity it provides.
The Kitchen and The Bar
In these candid scenes, the Zeiss Distagon truly separates itself from the competition.
In this bustling kitchen shot, the lens maintains incredible focus on the chef’s expression despite the high contrast environment. The textures of the stainless steel, the steam, and the fabric of his shirt are resolved with an acuance that makes the scene feel immediate and alive.
The bar scene just above, highlights the lens’s ability to handle flat or difficult lighting. There is a rich spectrum of grays that most modern optics would compress into a muddy mess. Instead, we see distinct separation between the, patrons, the bartender, and the background bottles and while the Summilux FLE might have introduced a romantic glow or softness in these dimly lit spaces, the Zeiss opts for the truth.
These images prove that the Zeiss 35mm ZM is not just a landscape lens, it is a street and portrait powerhouse. By utilizing the M10's color data for our monochrome conversions, we achieve a look that is both modern and classic. The Distagon swaps the 'nervous' rendering of the Summilux for a three dimensional stage. At the end of the day, the lens’s size is irrelevant when it produces images of this caliber. It is quite simply the best 35mm glass you can put on a rangefinder.
The final piece of the puzzle lies in these quasi portrait samples. While I am neither a professional portrait photographer nor a studio specialist, these environmental captures on both the M10 and M11 serve a critical purpose: they demonstrate the unrivaled optical capabilities of the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon in real world, candid scenarios.
In these shots ranging from the office setting to the dimly lit bar, the Distagon proves that character doesn't have to mean softness.
Even in the office portrait of a coworker with glasses, the lens's signature micro contrast is on full display. The texture of the facial hair and the subtle reflections in the eyewear are rendered with a biting clarity that makes the subject feel tangible.
The Medium Format Feel. Even without a studio setup, these images possess a medium format weight. The transition from the sharpest point of the eye to the gentle fall off of the background is liquid smooth. It creates a stage for the subject to live in, rather than just a flat image.
This series of images from the sun drenched buoys to the gritty monochrome interiors leads to one undeniable conclusion. The Leica 35mm Summilux FLE is a masterpiece of compact engineering, but the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM is a masterpiece of optics.
If you value the truth of your sensor and want a lens that renders with 3D pop and clinical purity, the Zeiss remains unrivaled. It is an old lens that was clearly designed for the future.
The Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM. The Undisputed King of the M11 Sensor
In the world of M mount optics, there is a pervasive myth that the most expensive glass from Wetzlar represents the undisputed ceiling of performance. For years, the Leica 35mm Summilux f/1.4 FLE has been the benchmark. However, there is an older contender that has quietly refused to cede its throne. The Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon may not be the newest kid on the block, but even when paired with the unforgiving 60MP sensor of the Leica M11, it proves that modern and superior are not always synonyms. In fact, it might just be the best 35mm lens ever made for the M-system, period.
A Results First Evaluation
I will not spend time on MTF charts, technical bench tests, or the same academic optical data that has been reported over the last decade. This review is focused purely on real world results. Furthermore, while much has been said about the physical size of this lens, the build quality is quite simply unmatched. It is a precision instrument that feels as substantial as the images it produces, a defiance of the trend toward lighter, plastic-heavy construction.
When the Leica M11 was released, it sent many photographers hunting for the latest APO lenses to satisfy its demanding high resolution sensor. Yet, looking backward often reveals more than looking forward. The Zeiss 35mm Distagon ZM has been around for over a decade, but it feels as though it was designed specifically for the digital fidelity of 2026. While Leica’s own 35mm Summilux FLE is a masterpiece of compact engineering, the Zeiss offers a rendering and clinical perfection that remains unrivaled.
Why the Distagon Still Sets the Gold Standard:
Legendary Pop and Micro-Contrast. The Distagon design is famous for its aggressive micro contrast. It doesn't just record shapes; it renders textures and depth with a tactile quality that makes the image feel three dimensional.
Incredibly Flat Field. Unlike the Summilux FLE, the Zeiss is known for having a field curvature that is remarkably flat across the frame. This ensures that when you focus on a subject, the sharpness remains consistent from edge to edge without the dip in resolution often found in compact Leica designs.
Superior Edge Correction. The Zeiss handles high-contrast edges with more grace than the non APO Summilux. Where the Leica might show slight blooming or fringing in harsh light, the Distagon remains clean.
Perhaps most importantly, you are receiving superior optical performance and a medium format render for roughly half the price of the Leica equivalent.
This isn’t just a legacy review, it’s a re-evaluation of a modern Zeiss classic that, even in 2026, still sets the gold standard for what a 35mm lens can achieve.
A Note on Terminology: What I Mean by Micro-contrast
Throughout this review, I use the term micro-contrast frequently. In the Leica community, this is often a polarizing term, but for the purposes of this evaluation on the M11, it refers to a very specific optical phenomenon.
In short, while the M11’s 60MP sensor provides the resolution, it is the Zeiss Distagon’s micro-contrast that provides the clarity and bite that makes the image feel real.
Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Landscape Performance: Edge to Edge Sharpness on the Leica M11
Critics often point to the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM’s physical size as a drawback, but one look at a landscape file from the Leica M11 renders that argument moot. In this shot at f/5.6, the 'empty' blue sky actually highlights the lens's greatest strength: clinical purity. Without clouds to hide behind, the Distagon shows off its perfectly flat field of focus and aggressive micro contrast. Notice the separation in the mid ground foliage. The lens renders the scene with a '3D pop' that the Leica Summilux FLE struggles to match, providing a sense of depth and atmospheric clarity that makes the 60MP sensor truly earn its keep.
Lets analyze this image
1. Exceptional mid tone contrast. The Zeiss Pop. Despite the harsh, direct overhead lighting, look at the transition between the dark evergreens. The Zeiss doesn't just record these as colors; it records them as textures. On the M11, this lens extracts a level of grit and detail from the foliage that makes the landscape feel tactile. This is where it pulls ahead of the Summilux FLE, which tends to have a smoother, more romantic rendering that can lose this bite in complex landscapes.
2. Handling the Empty sky as sen by the lack of clouds, but look at the horizon line. A lesser lens would show a slight smearing or chromatic aberration where the dark trees meet the bright blue sky. Here, the line is super clean. There is zero purple fringing or blooming, which is a testament to the Distagon’s superior color correction. The deep, rich blue of the sky is also a signature of Zeiss T* coating, which helps cut through haze and saturates blues more naturally than Leica's coatings.
3. Edge to Edge Sharpness at f/5.6 Even in the extreme bottom corners (the immediate foreground rocks and grass), the focus remains tack sharp. Many 35mm lenses suffer from field curvature, where if the center is sharp, the corners fall off. In this shot, the plane of focus feels perfectly flat. This allows the viewer's eye to wander from the immediate foreground to the distant mountains without ever hitting a soft patch.
4. Resolving the Distant Ridge If you zoom into the far background mountains, the M11/Zeiss combo is still resolving individual tree lines and rock faces. At f/5.6, you’ve reached the diffraction limited sweet spot of the lens. It proves that this 10 year old optical design isn't just keeping up with the M11, the lens was clerly designed with future higher mp sensors in mind.
Note, although the image has been cropped from top and bottom for better composition. The image retains 100% of the frame from left to right all the way to the edges.
Texture, Tones, and T* Color Science
If the landscape shots prove the Distagon’s consistency, its portrait performance on the M11 is nothing short of clinically sharp. Looking at the facial details, every pore and fine line is rendered with a staggering level of honesty. But the real triumph is in the hair, where other lenses might smudge fine textures into a singular shape, the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM resolves individual strands with microscopic precision. This is where it leaves the Leica 35mm Summilux FLE behind. While the Leica offers a beautiful 'glow,' the Zeiss offers the 'truth' of the 60 megapixel sensor.
One of the most striking aspects of the Zeiss 35mm Distagon on the M11 is its color science. While Leica glass is often celebrated for its 'warmth,' the Zeiss provides a clinical, lifelike neutrality that is arguably a better starting point for the M11’s DNG files. But the real magic is the separation. Even at f5.6, an aperture where most lenses start to flatten the image, the Distagon maintains its legendary '3D Pop.' By prioritizing micro-contrast over simple bokeh, it carves the subject out of the frame with precision. The result is an image that feels tangible. You don't just see the texture of the hair and the skin, you feel the physical distance between the subject and the world behind them.
Tonal Range and the 3D Monochrome Aesthetic
For the black and white enthusiast, the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM is a revelation. While many photographers hunt for vintage glass to get 'soul in their monochrome files, the Distagon offers something arguably more valuable, tonal transparency. Thanks to its exceptional contrast, the lens renders a rich spectrum of grays that most modern optics compress. Even when lighting is flat, the lens's ability to resolve fine textures gives the image a visceral, three dimensional presence. On the M11, this results in B&W files that are sharp yet possess a classic, silver halide depth that the busier bokeh of the Summilux FLE simply cannot replicate.
While the above image shows that classic look, this image demonstrates that the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM can deliver a strikingly modern monochrome. By utilizing DxO PhotoLab to harness the M11's raw dynamic range, the Zeiss glass provides the contrast necessary to make a scene feel electric. It trades the 'glow' of the Summilux FLE for a transparent, high fidelity realism where every pine needle and snowflake is accounted for. It is proof that in 2026, this 'older' lens is still the most capable tool for those who want their black and white photography to feel immediate and alive.
Additional B&W images are shown further down in this review.
Transparent Artistry: Why 'Perfection' Makes for Better Bokeh
While the Summilux FLE is often praised for its character, it can sometimes produce nervous or soap bubble bokeh (where the edges of out of focus highlights are bright and distracting). This photo shows the Zeiss doing the exact opposite.
The Leica Summilux 35mm FLE is often described as having 'soul,' which is usually code for 'optical flaws that look nice.' The Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 Distagon ZM, however, chooses the path of perfection. Shot wide open at f/1.4 on the M11, the bokeh is reminiscent of a medium format render. Creamy, effortless, and entirely devoid of the 'soap-bubble' nervousness found in Leica’s equivalent. But don't mistake smoothness for softness. The subject separation is achieved through a radical level of wide-open sharpness and a neutral color palette that feels modern and transparent. It doesn't just blur the background, it creates a three dimensional stage for the subject to live in.
Honest Chromatics: Depth Separation Beyond the Hue
While all images in this review were refined using DxO PhotoLab to ensure peak optical correction, the soul of the color comes directly from the glass. The Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM utilizes its T coating* to deliver a level of color purity that is, in many ways, more 'honest' than the Leica Summilux FLE. It avoids the warm bias of Wetzlar glass, instead offering a neutral, high contrast canvas. On the M11, this results in incredible subject separation. Again, I ahte to use this word so often. But, the micro-contrast is so high that even at f/2, the files possess a 'tactile' quality where colors feel separated by depth, not just hue.
The Distagon's Defiant Clarity
Looking at these buoy shots, the argument for the Zeiss over the Summilux FLE becomes undeniable. The sharpness isn't just about resolution. The clarity of the rendering are key as well. Processed through DxO PhotoLab, the files reveal a lens that is essentially 'perfect.' The way it handles the texture of weathered rope and flaking paint while maintaining a deep, saturated color palette shows that this 'old' lens was actually built for the future of 60MP sensors.
Why the Distagon on M10/M11 Beats Dedicated Glass
In this series of monochrome captures, the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon demonstrates that it doesn’t need the latest sensor or a dedicated monochrome body to deliver impressive results. Shot on the Leica M10, these images provide a compelling argument for the flexibility of color to monochrome conversion and the inherent superiority of Zeiss’s rendering over the Leica Summilux
The Myth of the Monochrome Camera While dedicated monochrome sensors are often praised, using the M10 with the Zeiss Distagon offers a distinct advantage.
Dynamic Channel Manipulation: By starting with a color file from the M10, you have the ability to manipulate color channels during the B&W conversion in DxO PhotoLab. This allows you to lighten or darken specific tones like the skin in the bar scene or the separation in the office portrait with a level of precision a monochrome sensor simply cannot offer.
The Zeiss T* coating ensures that the raw data reaching the M11 or M10 sensor is clean and high in contrast. This provides a purer digital negative, giving you more latitude to push shadows and pull highlights without introducing muddy artifacts.
Even on the M10, the nature of the Distagon is on full display.
In the office portrait and the bar scene, look at the rendering of fabric and hair. The lens avoids the smearing often seen in the Summilux FLE, instead resolving individual fibers and strands with microscopic clarity.
Where the Summilux often relies on a glow that can soften fine details in B&W, the Zeiss provides tonal transparency. The images appear better because they possess an integrity that makes the subjects feel more tangible and three-dimensional.
The Zeiss Pop is particularly evident in these greyscale files. The lens manages to find separation between very similar shades of grey, creating a silver halide depth that feels sophisticated and expensive.
Just for the heck of it, here is the color version of the above.
The Moot Point of Physical Size
As mentioned before, complaining about the size of the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon is a moot point. While it is undeniably larger than the Leica Summilux FLE, the proof is in the files. The lens just works. It doesn't ask for compromises in the corners or wide open performance; it simply delivers a perfect frame every time you hit the shutter.
On a body like the M10 or M11, the extra bulk whih in this case is minimal is a small price to pay for the medium format rendering and clinical clarity it provides.
The Kitchen and The Bar
In these candid scenes, the Zeiss Distagon truly separates itself from the competition.
In this bustling kitchen shot, the lens maintains incredible focus on the chef’s expression despite the high contrast environment. The textures of the stainless steel, the steam, and the fabric of his shirt are resolved with an acuance that makes the scene feel immediate and alive.
The bar scene just above, highlights the lens’s ability to handle flat or difficult lighting. There is a rich spectrum of grays that most modern optics would compress into a muddy mess. Instead, we see distinct separation between the, patrons, the bartender, and the background bottles and while the Summilux FLE might have introduced a romantic glow or softness in these dimly lit spaces, the Zeiss opts for the truth.
These images prove that the Zeiss 35mm ZM is not just a landscape lens, it is a street and portrait powerhouse. By utilizing the M10's color data for our monochrome conversions, we achieve a look that is both modern and classic. The Distagon swaps the 'nervous' rendering of the Summilux for a three dimensional stage. At the end of the day, the lens’s size is irrelevant when it produces images of this caliber. It is quite simply the best 35mm glass you can put on a rangefinder.
The portrait scene.
The final piece of the puzzle lies in these quasi portrait samples. While I am neither a professional portrait photographer nor a studio specialist, these environmental captures on both the M10 and M11 serve a critical purpose: they demonstrate the unrivaled optical capabilities of the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon in real world, candid scenarios.
In these shots ranging from the office setting to the dimly lit bar, the Distagon proves that character doesn't have to mean softness.
Even in the office portrait of a coworker with glasses, the lens's signature micro contrast is on full display. The texture of the facial hair and the subtle reflections in the eyewear are rendered with a biting clarity that makes the subject feel tangible.
The Medium Format Feel. Even without a studio setup, these images possess a medium format weight. The transition from the sharpest point of the eye to the gentle fall off of the background is liquid smooth. It creates a stage for the subject to live in, rather than just a flat image.
Why the Distagon still wins in 2026
This series of images from the sun drenched buoys to the gritty monochrome interiors leads to one undeniable conclusion. The Leica 35mm Summilux FLE is a masterpiece of compact engineering, but the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM is a masterpiece of optics.
If you value the truth of your sensor and want a lens that renders with 3D pop and clinical purity, the Zeiss remains unrivaled. It is an old lens that was clearly designed for the future.
Provide your feddback